When the Tools Learn Without Us: What the AI Wave Means for Work, Worth, and Our Children’s Future

A Parent's Reflection on the Coming AI Revolution (and Call for Opinions)

There’s a difference between a trend and a tide. Trends can be ignored. Tides pick you up.

The next tide is not simply “more tech.” It’s the moment our tools begin to learn without us and to make other tools. In “The Coming Wave: AI, Power, and Our Future”, Mustafa Suleyman, cofounder of DeepMind, and co-author Michael Bhaskar, argue that we are entering an era where intelligence itself becomes infrastructure, general, generative, and everywhere. You can dispute timelines. It’s much harder to dispute direction.

The amazing book explores how artificial intelligence, synthetic biology, and other self-improving technologies form a new kind of “wave”—one driven by systems that are autonomous, fast-evolving, and hard to contain. Innovations that spread faster than our ability to govern them. Suleyman warns that this wave, unlike any before it, will transform every layer of civilization: how we work, organize, and even define intelligence itself. Yet the book is not purely fatalistic; it’s an invitation to confront inevitability with wisdom, not denial.

This article isn’t a book review. It’s a parent’s attempt to look at that tide inspired by the book, then at a sleeping child down the hall, and ask: what happens to “work,” to “worth,” and to our role as guides when the tools keep learning after we’ve gone to bed?

1. The Wave Is Already Standing Up

Every civilization believes it lives at the end of history, until another invention proves it wrong. The steam engine shrank distance; the printing press multiplied voices; electricity rewired daily life. Yet all these were human-powered transformations—slow, understandable, visible. AI is something different. It’s a wave that teaches itself to rise higher.

When Suleyman describes how AlphaGo learned from 150,000 human games and then surpassed its teachers by playing millions of games against itself, he’s describing something profound: the moment knowledge stopped being a hand-me-down from human to machine and became an autocatalytic loop. AlphaZero went even further—learning Go from scratch in a single day.

This is not just faster learning. It’s a new category of evolution. Digital species that can improve without rest, without fatigue.

In less than ten years, the compute used to train frontier models has grown by a factor of one billion. What required a supercomputer a decade ago can now be run in a small lab, or on a laptop, if you’re creative enough. The barrier to entry has collapsed. The wave, Suleyman writes, “is not waiting to arrive; it is already forming.”

He argues that even if today’s architectures (say Large Language Models) plateau, new innovators will take the baton, just as combustion engines evolved from Otto’s early prototypes into Benz’s revolution. Momentum itself becomes the guarantee. The direction of travel is clear: intelligence will become cheaper, faster, and more abundant than at any point in human history.

So we face a question larger than efficiency: if intelligence becomes abundant, what becomes precious? If a system can read, reason, and write faster than we can imagine, what happens to the value of thought, of craft, of insight slowly earned?

2. Jobs Are Moving Targets Now

Every major wave rewrites the social contract between human skill and human dignity. The loom unmade the weaver; the motorcar erased the carriage maker; the light bulb extinguished entire industries of candle wax and tallow. But those waves automated muscle. This one automates mind.

The shift is not linear. It’s cascading. One year, we marvel at AI composing symphonies and drawing art; the next, we quietly watch it review contracts, write code, and pass the bar exam. As Suleyman notes, the improvement curve is no longer exponential. It’s self-exponential, because each generation of models assists in designing the next.

Even optimists concede: millions of tasks across nearly every job category are at risk. The displacement won’t feel like a single cataclysm but like a thousand quiet erosions: the spreadsheet that no longer needs an analyst, the design draft that no longer requires a junior artist, the lesson plan written by software before a teacher wakes up.

Yes, new jobs will appear, but Suleyman’s warning is clear: the timing won’t align. The speed of automation will outpace the speed of adaptation. It takes years to retrain a human mind, hours to upgrade a model. Yes, new jobs will appear. But who can guarantee those new jobs will be run by human.

The friction isn’t only technical. It’s emotional, geographic, cultural. When your sense of self is bound to your work, losing that work feels like losing your reflection. We talk about “re-skilling,” but re-skilling is not the same as re-rooting one’s identity.

For parents, this isn’t an abstract debate. The urgency is deeply personal. Our children will grow up in an economy where the ground itself shifts. They might never know the concept of a stable profession—only evolving roles that dissolve as fast as they appear. So what do we anchor them to, if not occupation? What becomes the new center of human purpose? What are the essential skills that they should acquire?

3. Beyond Control: When Tools Begin to Choose

We used to comfort ourselves with a simple creed: technology is a tool. Tools don’t decide. They don’t dream. They don’t disobey. Tools don’t wake up in the night and reconfigure themselves.

But what happens when the tool begins to write its own instruction manual? The systems now arriving learn. They improve in loops we can’t fully trace, and sometimes we don’t entirely know why they work as well as they do. Suleyman describes this as the autonomy problem. Machines now learn strategies we can’t fully explain, and sometimes, neither can their creators. Neural networks deliver results whose internal logic remains opaque, useful but mysterious.

When that happens, “control” becomes less about switches and more about alignment: a negotiation of goals and values with entities that may not share ours.

Here’s the uncomfortable parallel: parenting is itself a form of alignment. We guide a being that learns, adapts, surprises us. We hope it will grow wise, not merely obedient. We cannot script its choices; we can only shape its judgment. Parenting and AI stewardship are versions of the same dilemma: how to nurture autonomy without losing control.

What happens when we must raise our children and our machines side by side? One learns emotions faster than logic; the other learns logic without emotions. Which one will model humanity better?

4. The Meaning of Work and What Comes After

If intelligence can be automated, then work, the central organizing idea of modern life, must be redefined. We often say “AI will free us for creative tasks,” but creation itself is being mechanized. So what remains?

Perhaps meaning shifts from doing to deciding. From efficiency to ethics. From production to purpose. Our children might not compete with machines. They might collaborate with them, orchestrating systems that exceed human comprehension but still rely on human conscience.

Future jobs may not resemble occupations at all. They might look like moral roles: stewardship, translation, mediation, curation, accountability. These are not “tasks” a model can optimize; they are burdens a society entrusts to people.

As parents, our role is not to train our children to outrun the wave, but to give them the ballast to ride it: an inner sense of value that doesn’t collapse when the metrics of productivity change. The child who learns patience while tying her shoes is not merely learning dexterity; she is learning how to be unfinished, how to endure the slow arc of mastery. Those traits, curiosity, restraint, and moral clarity, will matter more than any technical skill that can be automated overnight.

Closing Reflections

The wave will not ask for permission. It will not pause for regulation, nor wait for consensus. It will arrive unevenly, flooding some shores before others, but it will come. The question is no longer if, but how we will live within it.

And so, a few questions worth keeping. Not for answers, but for orientation:

When intelligence becomes cheap, what will we still call “wisdom”?

• If work is no longer the anchor of identity, where will dignity take root?

• What virtues must survive automation—curiosity, empathy, wonder, restraint—and how do we model them at home?

• Can we raise children who not only use intelligent tools but also question what those tools are for? And more, to question the convenient answers from the tools.

• If machines can imagine endlessly, what do we want humans to dream about?

The wave is coming, and our children will not step toward it; they will grow within it. That realization is not despair. It’s an invitation: to be deliberate, to be human, and to raise a generation who can hold on to meaning in a world that automates almost everything else.

If the tools are learning without us, what do we want our children to learn that no tool ever can?

---

Playful Brains is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

If you’d like to support my work with a one-time gesture, thank you so much! Every little bit helps and truly means a lot!